Technologies

Built by BLG · Tender Management

Find the right tenders. Bid on the ones you can win.

An AI-assisted platform that discovers new tenders daily, screens them against your eligibility, and carries the ones worth bidding on through review, binder, submission and award.

Lifecycle
Intake → review → bid → award
Screening
Rules first, AI second, human last
Deadline alerts
Daily, via Slack
Architecture
Multi-tenant SaaS

The lifecycle

From a new listing to a signed award.

  1. 01

    Discover

    New tenders are pulled in automatically every day, with a catch-up pass for any missed dates and a separate watch on tenders closing soon.

  2. 02

    Screen

    Each tender is checked against your company profile — turnover, experience, certifications, scope — and marked eligible, ineligible or for manual review, with the reason recorded.

  3. 03

    Review

    Your bid team works a daily review board: the AI's decision and reasoning alongside the tender, filters for MSME and startup exemptions, and one-click labelling.

  4. 04

    Bid

    Approved tenders move to a pipeline with supervisors, comments, an AI bid-value estimate, and a bid binder assembled from your own document library.

  5. 05

    Track

    From submission through technical and financial evaluation to won or lost — every state change is tracked, and deadline alerts fire before it is too late.

AI, applied carefully

Rules decide first. The model judges the rest.

Eligibility is where bids are won or wasted. So the system is built to be cautious: it narrows the field with rules you can audit, and hands people the cases that need a person.

  • Hardware-supply, domain-locked and over-scale tenders are filtered out by rules before any model is called
  • Turnover, experience and ISO-family requirements are matched deterministically against your profile
  • A language model handles only the qualitative judgement, returning a decision, reasons and a relevance score
  • A relevance classifier retrains on your team's own labels — the more you review, the sharper the queue
  • Where a tender can't be confidently decided, it goes to a person — it is never silently dropped
  • Per-organisation data isolation, with each tenant in its own database schema

Core modules

Everything a bid team touches, in one place.

01

Daily tender intake

Automated daily runs with backfill, tender documents downloaded and stored, and a run report posted to your team channel.

02

Eligibility screening

Deterministic checks on turnover, experience and certifications run before the AI is consulted. Every decision records its stage and reason.

03

Document extraction

Structured view of each tender: value, fee, EMD, timeline, eligibility criteria, exemptions, required documents and scope of work.

04

Review board

A paginated daily queue with AI-versus-human agreement tracking, so you can see how much the screening can be trusted.

05

Bid pipeline

Upcoming, approved, submitted and awarded stages with archive, importance flags, supervisor assignment and comments.

06

Bid binder generator

Matches each tender checklist item to your company documents and compiles an indexed PDF binder on your letterhead, versioned per revision.

07

EMD & fee accounts

Instrument, bank and expiry tracking for EMD and tender fees, refund follow-up, performance guarantees, and letter generation.

08

Alerts & roles

One-week, two-day and expired deadline alerts, approved-but-not-submitted reminders, and role-based access for admins, operators and accounts.

Why Tender Management

Proven on our own bids first.

Built by a team that bids

BLG built this for its own tender operations first, and runs it on real tenders every working day.

Conservative by design

Deterministic rules decide what they can. The model is used for judgement, and uncertain cases are routed to people.

One system, start to award

Replaces spreadsheets, portal alerts and chat threads with a single record of every tender and its state.

Learns from your team

Reviewer labels feed back into relevance scoring, and agreement between AI and reviewers is measured, not assumed.

See it screen a day’s tenders.